This body of publications focuses on the systematic reviews of SEM assessment technology and confirms how sub-epidermal moisture is used to identify increased risk of pressure injury. Also included are health economic papers highlighting the cost effectiveness and efficiency of using SEM assessment technology.
Aim: The objective of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adding measurement of SEM to current standard of care (SoC), with the aim of reducing the incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers
Aim: To assess all published studies which describe what happens to the delivery of pressure ulcer/injury (PI/PU) care pathways as a result of detecting raised sub-epidermal moisture (SEM) delta (∆ ≥ 0.6).
Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of SEM measurement compared with visual skin assessment (VSA). A decision-tree model was developed. Outcomes are quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and costs to the UK National Health Service.
Aim: Our objective was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adopting sub-epidermal moisture scanners in comparison to existing hospital-acquired pressure injury prevention guidelines structured around subjective risk assessments.
Aim: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine whether sufficient research evidence exists to support the use of bedside technologies for early detection of pressure injures, which is inclusive of pressure-related blanchable erythema (PrBE), pressure-related nonblanchable erythema (PrNBE), and deep tissue pressure injury (DTPI).
Click here to access our extensive SEM assessment technology bibliography
If you would like to discuss any of the clinical, health economic or real-world evidence on the website or would like further information on them the team would be happy to assist. Please contact us at: [email protected]
"*" indicates required fields