Real World
Evidence


Earlier is better in the treatment of Pressure Injuries/Ulcers (PI/PUs), where a timely intervention can reverse the damage and prevent redness at the skin level.

#PreventionMadeReal

Please select from our real world evidence detailed below to find out more.

Community Care

Striving for Perfect Care – Preventing skin breakdown in the community setting in the UK

Nicky Ore. et al., Head of Clinical Governance, Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust EPUAP, Lyon, France, 2019

Read More

Objectives

Aim to prevent and reduce the numbers of pressure injuries/ulcers (PI/PUs) developed within the community care setting

A total of 445 PI/PUs were reported by Mersey Care NHS Foundation Trust Community Services during Q1 2019/20

This included:
Present on admission
Developed whilst on the caseload
Deterioration whilst on the caseload

Method

2 pilot district nursing sites identified for a 12-week PURP with a focus on palliative care patients

Patients scanned 4 - 5 days per week

Intervention was implemented depending upon the results of the SEM Scanner readings


Results

16.1% PI/PU incidence in the pre-study pilot period

11.8% PI/PU incidence achieved during study pilot period

Incidence during the study period reduced by 26.9%

Discussion

Trust Executive Team agreed to procure SEM Scanners for every District Nursing Team and Ward 35 (Intermediate Care)

SEM Scanner implemented into clinical practice across all District Nurse Bases


Click here to download in PDF format

Results from a New Pressure Ulcer Prevention Bundle
A Community Facility

EWMA, Bremen, Germany 2016

Read More

Objectives

To develop a holistic risk assessment as part a prevention strategy to support a zero-tolerance policy for avoidable Hospital Acquired Pressure Injuries/Ulcers (HAPI/Us)

Method

6 month pilot on 2 wards at a community facility during 2016. This was to develop a new pressure injury/ulcer (PI/PU) prevention strategy termed the Pressure Damage Prevention Bundle. The development of the matrix was to provide clinicians with a focused visual tool to aid clinical decision making.

Patients were scanned on admission then 2 and 3 days post admission. Patients are classed into one of the 4 quadrants based on their risk assessment and SEM Scanner values and the treatment protocols were applied based on which quadrant the patient was assessed into.

Results

Following the 6 month pilot on the 2 clinical ward areas Hospital Acquired Pressure Injury/Ulcer (HAPI/U) incidence reduced to below 0.1%

Previously patients would have been allocated a special mattress regardless based on an elevated risk assessment score

Discussion

The results of the SEM Scanner pilot at a community facility demonstrated that using the SEM Scanner (in combination with traditional standards of visual skin assessment) led to more sensitive and specific patient diagnosis. When acted on, these combined evidences resulted in a dramatic drop in PI/PU incidence


Click here to download in PDF format

Acute Care

Evaluation of Novel Sub-Epidermal Moisture (SEM) Technology in Early Pressure Ulcer Detection Versus Conventional Techniques

Sharon O’Keeffe, CNS Tissue Viability & Pat McCluskey Advanced Nurse Practitioner, Cork University Hospital, Ireland
Tissue Viability Conference, Southampton, UK, 2019

Read More

Objectives

To compare the clinical utility of using a SEM Scanning device versus subjective visual skin inspection in the early detection of Category 1 Pressure Injury/Ulcer (PI/PU)

To observe whether SEM data triggers the allocation of preventative interventions

To compare the rate of Hospital Acquired Pressure Injury/Ulcer (HAPI/U) before and during the SEM Scanner evaluation

Method

32 orthopaedic/plastic surgery patients

Waterlow ≥ 10 (at risk to very high risk)

12 week duration

3 consecutive readings taken from sacrum, heels and ischial tuberosities

SEM Delta of ≥0.6 = increased risk of PI/PU


Results

Pre-evaluation HAPI/U incidence rate = 12%

No patients developed a HAPI/U during the evaluation

72% (n=23) patients showed evidence of incipient tissue damage

15 subjects with no visible signs of damage 33% (n=5) had positive scan results indicative of underlying damage

Discussion

SEM Scanning presents an exciting innovation... a method of objectively assessing tissue health before damage becomes visible

Delta readings prompted front line staff to implement targeted interventions

5 patients potentially receiving preventative measures that they may not have had otherwise

Click here to download in PDF format

Utility of a sensor-based technology to assist in the prevention of pressure ulcers: A clinical comparison

Rose Raizman. et al., Scarborough Health Network, Canada

International Wound Journal, 2018, 1-12

Read More

Objectives

A two-phased study designed to evaluate the clinical utility of the SEM Scanner and to see if the Hawthorne effect played a part in the results

Method

Phase 1 - patients provided with a standard of care risk assessment and interventions and scanning by SEM Scanner but the resulting SEM scores were not used to determine interventions

Phase 2 - identical to phase 1 except that the resulting SEM scores were used in conjunction with risk assessment to determine appropriate interventions and care planning


Results

284 patients evaluated in the 2 phases
On 3 inpatient wards
Over a 7-month period

Phase 1 results:

12/89 patients developed pressure injuries/ulcers (PI/PUs) (4 category 1, 6 Category 2, 1 Category 3 and 1 Deep Tissue Injury (DTI).

Phase 2 results:

2/195 patients developed PI/PUs (1 Category 1 and 1 Category 2).

This illustrated a 93% reduction in Hospital Acquired Pressure Injury/Ulcer (HAPI/PUs) compared to phase 1.

Discussion

93% decrease in HAPI/U rate following interventions using the SEM Scanner scores

A strategic approach to PI/PU management with the use of SEM Scanner for identification of PI/PU improves patients outcomes

SEM Scanner made non-visible damage identifiable by providing a numerical readout, alerting clinicians to implement stronger prevention strategies.

No Hawthorne effect noted


Click here to download in PDF format

Improved clinical outcomes in pressure ulcer prevention using the SEM Scanner

Glenn Smith, Formerly Clinical Nurse Specialist, Nutrition & Tissue Viability, St Mary’s Hospital, Isle of White

Journal of Wound Care, 2019, Vol 28:5

Read More

Objectives

Evaluation of a sub-epidermal moisture (SEM) Scanner to detect non visible pressure damage, allowing appropriately targeted pressure injury/ulcer (PI/PU) prevention interventions

Method

Evaluation on a medical-surgical inpatient ward over a period of 2 months

35 patients included in the evaluation

Heels and sacrum scanned on admission and daily thereafter


Results

91% of patients had delta values ≥0.6 indicating inflammatory changes that without intervention may have progressed to a PI/PU

Zero Hospital Acquired Pressure Injuries/Ulcers (HAPI/Us) developed during the evaluation in this patient group

Discussion

The inclusion of SEM Scanner as part of the patient examination informed clinicians about early damage

Identification of pressure damage prior to it being visible would allow the most appropriate resource use


Click here to download in PDF format

Hospice Care

Prevention, Prevention, Prevention -
Tackling the No 1 Patient Safety Issue

Gillian Raine, Lead Nurse, Marie Curie, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK

Patient Safety Congress, Manchester, UK, 2018

Read More

Objectives

A quality drive for improvement to prevent damage occurring

Hospice Acquired Pressure Injuries/Ulcers (HAPI/Us) data for 34 patients developed 36 PI/PUs from Nov 2016 - Nov 2017

Overall HAPI/Us incidence rate = 9% prior to using SEM Scanner

Method

6 Month pilot period

Focus on sacrum, buttocks & heels

All patients

Baseline scan performed as part of admission protocol, including Waterlow Risk Assessment & SSKIN check

Daily scan thereafter


Results

Evaluation period of pilot incidence rate 4.8%

Pre pilot period incidence rate 9%

Reduction HAPI/U incidence rate 47%

Discussion

Move to full implementation of SEM Scanner with the creation of own tools and guidelines for use


Click here to download in PDF format

Learn more about the

Provizio® SEM Scanner

Watch now

Are you ready to implement?

Call our team or simply send us an email, including your name, phone number and email address.

+44 (0)1625 238 895
[email protected]